Wealth Club

Subtitle

Blog

view:  full / summary

13 Wardrobe Staples & How I Decide Whether To Splurge Or Save On Each

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Curating your ideal wardrobe shouldn’t put your finances in the red. While the internal debate to splurge on an item or save your money is a constant hardship for many, here are a few items you should and shouldn’t spend your hard earned money on.

1. T-shirts: Save your money. T-shirts can shrink in the dryer, get stains from your drink spilling, and even the nicest $80 ones can fall apart. You’re better off heading to Target to pick up a couple tees for wear and tear.

2. Jeans: Splurge. Yes, you heard me correctly. From personal experience, I have a flawless pair of jeans that cost me $200, and I’m on year three of wearing them. In the past three years, I would guess I have worn the trusty pair of skinny jeans at least 300 times. In terms of cost per use, that’s about 66 cents per wear. If you find a high-quality pair of denim that fits you like a glove and you will wear multiple times a week for years to come, it’s worth the splurge.

3. Winter Coat: To me, it makes so much sense to splurge on a coat. A good coat will keep you toasty and you will wear it five to seven times a week in the frigid temperatures of winter (you don’t want a flimsy one when a blizzard comes either). Plus, a well-made coat is possible to wear for maybe three to five winter seasons. This winter, try finding one on sale after the Christmas holidays so that way your splurge doesn’t do too much damage to your bank account.

4. Skirts/Pants: With a surplus of fast fashion stores offering pants and skirts of all kinds, you can save money on these products. The only thing I will remark on is to make sure the pants or skirt you buy fit you nicely. Don’t compromise on the shape because a cheap pair of pants or skirt can still look sophisticated if they fit you impeccably.

5. Blouses/Shirt: Think about saving in this category. A blouse or shirt can be tempting to splurge on to look oh-so-chic for an enviable Instagram post, but think about how trendy shirt silhouettes and loud prints can be. One-minute polka dot print is in and then next, leopard can be spotted all over the gram (pun intended). Be careful about spending too much on a blouse or shirt that won’t carry you into the next season.

6. Boots: Coming from experience, splurge. You will wear a pair of classic boots far more in your 20s than ever before. Comfortable, neutral boots will look put-together with a multitude of outfits. Just be sure to take care of them to ensure the longevity of their life.

7. Dresses: There are endless affordable options for you to save money on dresses. Simply put, a flattering dress can be found on the lower side of your wardrobe budget.

8. Jewelry: There is no trendy jewelry worth more than 30 dollars. Sure, a family heirloom may grace your hand or neck from time-to-time, but unless you are gifted a beautiful piece of jewelry, try not to spend too much on the item. Instead, opt to find cheap alternatives to pricey pieces at places like Forever 21, Urban Outfitters, or even Etsy.

9. Sweaters: Splurge on one, singular knit sweater. The key word in that sentence is one! A chunky, wool sweater is a staple you will wear for years to come. However a tight, thin turtleneck you can save on and buy a sleek one from one of the many post-holiday sales going on.

10. Hats and Scarves: This is really a preference. Cold-weather essentials are easy to find deals on so my best advice is try to save on these. Luxurious, cashmere hats and soft, alpaca scarves may seem smart to invest in, but there are plenty of alternatives out there.

11. Jackets and Blazers: Consider splurging on timeless jackets and blazers. A classic denim jacket and black, streamlined blazer never go out of style and both items you will wear consistently throughout the year. Also, having a great jacket or blazer draped over a cheap t-shirt makes that t-shirt look expensive (when in reality you paid very little for it).

12. Gym Clothes: There is no excuse not to save. With workout outlet stores a plenty, gym clothes should be a small expense. Those clothes will soak up sweat and it’s more about the work out than how you look. Consider that when fancying yourself a new pair of the infamous Lulu Lemon leggings.

13. Underwear and Socks: Most of us can agree to save in this category. You’re most likely going to go through underwear and socks much faster than most clothing items. Why spend 40 dollars on a single pair of socks? That’s pure lunacy. Get a three pack for ten dollars or less at most department stores.

Image via Unsplash

Like this story? Follow The Financial Diet on FacebookInstagram, and Twitter for daily tips and inspiration, and sign up for our email newsletter here.

In-Post Social Banners-04




Source: https://thefinancialdiet.com/13-wardrobe-staples-how-i-decide-whether-to-splurge-or-save-on-each/

Facing Enrollment Declines, Colleges Seek Out New, Creative Ways To Make Money

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Enrollment of both undergrads and graduate students has been declining for years. Meanwhile colleges are getting more creative in finding new ways to make money.



Source: https://www.npr.org/2018/12/13/676534628/facing-enrollment-declines-colleges-seek-out-new-creative-ways-to-make-money

GoM favours uniform tax on lottery, GST Council to decide rate on Feb 20

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

A state ministerial panel set up to review tax rate on lottery Monday favoured a uniform GST rate of either 18 per cent or 28 per cent -- a final call on which would be taken by the GST Council at its meeting on February 20.

Currently, a state-organised lottery attracts 12 per cent GST while a state-authorised lottery attracts 28 per cent tax.

The eight-member Group of Ministers under Maharashtra Finance Minister Sudhir Mungantiwar favoured hiking GST rate on the state-organised lottery to either 18 per cent or 28 per cent. While the GST rate on state-authorised lottery would be retained at 28 per cent or brought down to 18 per cent.

"The GoM favoured a uniform GST rate for both state-organised and state-authorised lotteries. A final call on whether that rate should be 18 per cent or 28 per cent would be taken by the GST Council on Wednesday," an official said.

The other members of the committee are West Bengal Finance Minister Amit Mitra, Kerala Finance Minister Thomas Isaac, Assam Finance Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, Punjab Finance Minister Manpreet Singh Badal, Goa Panchayat Minister Mauvin Godinho, Karnataka Finance Minister Krishna Byre Gowda, Arunachal Tax and Excise Minister Jarkar Gamlin.

While Isaac did not attend the GoM meet on medical ground, Badal was not present as he had to present the state budget in Punjab Assembly.

Tax officers from West Bengal attended the meeting and is said to have flagged the issue of rate rationalisation in the light of the general election slated to be held by May.

"Other states, including major ones like Maharashtra, Assam, favoured a uniform GST rate," the official added.

The GoM was also tasked to suggest whether private persons authorised by the states were misusing the lower rate and getting enriched themselves at the cost of the state and suggest measures to curb it.

It was also mandated to examine issues related to enforcement including the legal frame work, so as to prevent evasion of tax on lottery and suggest appropriate tax rate to address the problem.

"It was decided in the GoM meet that decision relating to tax rate changes should be brought before the GST Council on February 20. Evasion aspect in lottery can be dealt in subsequent meetings," the official said.

The ministerial panel was set up last month to suggest whether a uniform tax rate should be imposed on lotteries or the current differential tax rate system be continued.

The 33rd GST Council meeting would also take up the issue of lowering Goods and Services Tax (GST) on under-construction residential properties to 5 per cent without ITC, from 12 per cent currently. On affordable housing segment, it was suggested that GST be slashed to 3 per cent, from 8 per cent.

Currently, GST is levied at 12 per cent with input tax credit (ITC) on payments made for under-construction property or ready-to-move-in flats where completion certificate has not been issued at the time of sale.

The effective pre-GST tax incidence on such housing property was 15-18 per cent.

GST, however, is not levied on buyers of real estate properties for which completion certificate has been issued at the time of sale.

There have been complaints that builders are not passing on the ITC benefit to consumers by way of reduction in price of the property after the rollout of GST, following which the GST Council had set up a ministerial panel to suggest ways to boost realty sector.




Source: https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/gom-favours-uniform-tax-on-lottery-gst-council-to-decide-rate-on-feb-20-119021800763_1.html

Artist Reflections: Witch Prophet on the Toils and Triumphs of Being an Independent Artist in 2018

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

witchprophet 2018For our “Artist Reflections” series, we asked artists responsible for some of the year’s best records to discuss a topic that’s been close to their hearts over the last 12 months. In this piece, Canadian vocalist Ayo Leilani—aka Witch Prophet—to discuss the long journey leading up to this year’s emotional debut album, The Golden Octaveher upcoming anniversary plans for 88 Days of Fortune, the Toronto-based collective she co-founded in 2009; the importance of raising up women, queer, and non-binary-identifying artists in her hometown and beyond; and more.

When I say that my album, The Golden Octave, was 10 years in the making, it’s literally because I was too scared to share a full body of work for 10 years of being in the music scene in Toronto and in Canada. I would release singles here and there, but nothing that was like…this is my album. It was fear: fear of rejection, fear of failure, fear that nobody would like my music. A lot of it also had to do with the fact that I could not find production that I could use. A lot of my earlier material had this classic hip-hop styles, almost like a mixtape: I’d find a 9th Wonder beat and sing over it, but it was like, ‘I can’t release this for real.’

Over the past five years, my partner Sun Sun had been really pushing me to finish the album and get over my fears. I found a handful of producers who were really eager to be a part of the project. Sun Sun was the main producer; she helped create five of the 11 instrumentals I sang on, but also helped me in terms of not thinking of the album as this one, big thing, but rather to take it one step at a time, one song at a time.

That’s really what helped me overcome the fear of doing this large-scale project. I applied for a lot of Canadian Arts Council grants for funding, but didn’t get them—so I was lucky that the producers that I worked with were happy to just get a cut of publishing and online sales, rather than upfront fees. (I still plan on applying for grants for future projects, though, because getting a lump sum of $10,000 is a lot better than taking it out of your own pocket, which is what I had to do.)

Before the album dropped, I was really close to going back to catering gigs, which is what I used to do. It killed me, working in catering, the long hours spent on my feet; I never got to pursue my music. Three or four years ago, I quit to focus on music full-time, working to get any bookings or licensing deals that could help me raise money: just kind of living on the edge, teetering on poverty. Financially, I’m definitely not out of the woods—but being an artist is more fulfilling than working a 9-to-5, even if you’re never not working. And I love it. I love music. I’m willing to put in the work and sacrifice a lot of the things that I would normally be able to do if I had a full-time job by just focusing on music.

I think the number one thing that’s kept me going is that I get physically ill when I’m not doing music. That’s happened with every other job I’ve had, including the catering gig. I know how my body reacts, and I can’t not do art: this is what I have to do, and the arts are where I belong. Whenever people write me to tell me that my songs—especially ‘Listen,’ which deals with themes of mental illness and suicide—have touched them, I’m always a little surprised, because when I write, I’m not thinking about how it’s going to affect other people; I’m thinking about whether or not it heals me, and in that aspect, maybe it’ll heal somebody else. I’ve also had people hit me up to tell me the opposite: one friend told me that they were really nervous about listening to the album at first, because they knew that it contained ‘Listen’—which I had dedicated to them—and they’d struggled with those same issues.

But my friend did listen to the album. And and they loved it. They even sent me a video of themselves crying and singing along. I’m tearing up just thinking about it: I’ve always wanted to create something that would touch other people, and not just make them want to dance and party. (That said, I’d love to make a dance party record! It’s just not something I can do right now, because I have my own issues, and until I get to the point where I don’t have anything to deal with except what I’m going to be wearing on Friday night, or who I’m going to dance with, my songs are going to be pretty, uh…intense.)

quote 1

I’ve also had people say—before even listening to my music—that my stage name alone frightens them! ‘Yeah, your name really scared me,’ they’ll say, ‘but then I listened to the songs, and they really touched me.’

I think that speaks to how we’re so afraid of powerful women; it’s why women were called witches to begin with. It’s always interesting, the perception people have on the basis of name alone. No, I’m not going to put a curse on you.

When I was growing up, my mom always asked me if I had a plan B if music didn’t work out; I’d always say, ‘I don’t want to focus on a plan B because then I’m not one hundred percent on my plan A.’ In a way, she was right. My plan B, in terms of thinking of the future, is having a label and helping other artists so they don’t have to struggle the way I did as an independent, self-made musician. When we started 88 Days of Fortune, in 2009, there was no platform that specifically showcased women or queer people or non-binary people in Toronto’s hip-hop, R&B, and urban scenes, which were very separated at the time. We started out as a boutique label that also did bookings and showcases, as well as PR. Things change, and people change, and you change along with them. If you don’t, you become stagnant. There are other organizations in the city who don’t recognize that growing with the scene is better than romanticizing one part of it.

That was really the basis of me recognizing the importance of building community support and creating the scene you want: if someone’s not giving you a platform, you have to build one yourself. Working with 88 Days really showed me just how talented musicians from Toronto (not to mention neighboring areas like Scarborough, and Mississauga) really are, and how we lack the structure and foundation for it. It also showed me the value of my own self-worth, because I didn’t go to school for any of this stuff; I just learned it along the way. In the beginning, I was more timid—’I’m doing this thing, I hope you like it!’—whereas now, I’m like, ‘I helped shed a spotlight and provide a platform for this scene that was already here that nobody was paying attention to, and I’m proud about that.’

2019 will mark the 10th anniversary of 88 Days of Fortune. For our 10th year, we’re really focusing on organizing the business better. As such, 88 Days has transformed into Heart Lake Records, which is the record label, and Fortune Bookings, which is our bookings agency.  It’s still 88 Days—the same people, the same mission of supporting women and non-binary artists and their allies—just with a name change. We recently purchased a farm just 45 minutes outside of Toronto, and Sun Sun and I spent the past year or so renovating the farmhouse; our plan is to make the main floor an artist residency space, as well as a place to hold events. Additionally, we’ll be launching a outdoor music and arts festival next summer, which will also double as the launch of the label: the Heart Lake Music & Arts Festival.

One of my main goals with The Golden Octave was to challenge people’s perceptions of black women as artists—not just in terms of what they can sing about, but who they are onstage. Looking back, I think I achieved that, at least to some degree. Most of the songs deal with existential questions, and they’re not necessarily love songs: this album isn’t exactly what most people would consider R&B. And with regards to the Canadian music industry, I think I have definitely changed people’s minds. I’ve been invited to play over 30 festivals, many of which featured predominantly white audiences, and relatively few hip-hop acts; I was on the cover for NOW, one of Toronto’s biggest weekly magazines.

On the other hand, there are plenty of people who don’t get it. Sun Sun DJs during my live show, so whenever we’re onstage, we’re automatically treated as a hip-hop group, even if I’m singing a folk song. I’m still recognized as an R&B or hip-hop artist, which I definitely am (although I go back and forth on it), but I want that definition to be expanded, or at the very least, for people to acknowledge the legitimacy of having a DJ onstage. All said, I do plan on growing my stage performance to include live musicians in the future once I have the money to support them.

All of the things that have happened to me this year—from the album, to the tour, to the press—I did as an independent, self-managed artist, with no PR, agent, or anything. I’m so grateful for all the editorial teams that put me on, and I’m also grateful for Bandcamp (for real, I always tell people how great the platform is!). A new Witch Prophet album is on the way for 2019, so be on the lookout!

-As told to Zoe Camp



Source: https://daily.bandcamp.com/2018/12/21/artist-reflections-witch-prophet/

Dow Jones Futures Rise After Stock Rout; These 5 Stocks Are Big Movers

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Dow Jones futures rose solidly late Wednesday, along with S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures, but that came after Wednesday's stock market rout slammed the major indexes. After the close, Tesla (TSLA), Microsoft (MSFT), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Visa (V), Align Technology (ALGN) and O'Reilly Auto Parts (ORLY) were notable stocks moving on earnings.

Tesla stock soared late, while Dow Jones components Visa and Microsoft advanced. But AMD stock, Align stock and O'Reilly stock crashed.

Dow Jones Futures Today

Dow Jones futures rose 0.3% vs. fair value. S&P 500 futures advanced 0.4%. Nasdaq 100 futures popped 0.7%. Remember that action in Dow futures, Tesla stock, AMD stock and elsewhere doesn't necessarily translate into actual trading in the next regular session. That's often been true in the current stock market correction, with big moves intraday and after hours.

In Wednesday's stock market trading, the Dow Jones slid 2.4%, falling below its 200-day line even with Dow giant Boeing (BA) rising on earnings. The Nasdaq composite plunged 4.4%, and the S&P 500 index lost 3.1%. All three indexes undercut Tuesday's intraday low. The latest stock market rout wiped out all the Dow Jones and S&P 500 gains for 2018.

Bottom line: It's a stock market correction.

Tesla Earnings

Tesla earnings came in at $2.90 a share, blowing out estimates for a 19-cent loss. Revenue soared to $6.8 billion as Tesla Model 3 output picked up.

Shares jumped 12% in late trading. Tesla stock closed down 1.9% to 288.50. Shares shot up nearly 13% Tuesday after short-seller Citron Research went long on Tesla.

Analysts likely will have questions about Model 3 production, operating costs, capital spending and more for Elon Musk in the post-earnings conference call beginning at 6:30 p.m. ET.

AMD Earnings

AMD earnings met adjusted per-share views, but sales came in light. Graphics chip sales were a weak spot.

Shares crashed 22% in late trading. AMD stock closed down 9.2% to 22.79, hitting a two-month low amid several negative chip earnings reports. The Philly Sox index tumbled 6.6% Wednesday to a 13-month low.

AMD stock ran up sharply after its last earnings report on July 25. It hit a 12-year high of 34.14 on Sept. 13. A big part of the stock's rally stemmed from Intel (INTC), which cited delays in its next-generation chip. One reason for AMD stock's subsequent fall was Intel indicating that it was making progress on that front. Intel earnings are due Thursday.

Microsoft Earnings

Microsoft earnings and revenue for the software giant's fiscal first quarter were well above estimates.

Shares rose 2.6% late. Microsoft stock closed down 5.35% to 102.32, falling further from its 50-day line and approaching its 200-day. But the Dow Jones tech giant's relative strength line, which tracks a stock's performance vs. the S&P 500 index, is still near a record high.

Visa Earnings

Visa earnings topped views, but the card giant's revenue came in light.

Shares rose 1.7% late. Visa stock closed down 3.5% to 134.26, consolidating since its Oct. 1 peak of 151.56. The Dow Jones component is trading between its 50-day and 200-day averages.

Align Technology Earnings

Invisalign maker Align Technology earnings topped forecasts, but guidance came in light. Align stock tumbled 18.5% in late trade. During Wednesday's session, Align stock slid 6.7% to 290.83, losing sight of the 200-day line and hitting a five-month low.

O'Reilly Auto Parts Earnings

O'Reilly Auto Parts earnings drove past forecasts, but sales missed and the auto parts retailer gave weak EPS guidance.

Shares skidded 4% late. O'Reilly stock already closed down 5.1% to 322.83, tumbling below its 50-day line and hitting a two-month low. Shares have been working on a 351.75 flat-base buy point.

Several other notable stocks reported late Wednesday, including ServiceNow (NOW), Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX), Las Vegas Sands (LVS) and many more.

YOU ALSO MIGHT LIKE:

The Big Picture: Why Growth Stocks Are Near Bear Market Territory

Why This Correction Is More Dangerous Than A Bear Market

How To Trade Growth Stocks: Why Buy On The Follow-Through Day?

IBD's ETF Market Strategy

Best Dividend Stocks: 5 High-Yield Stocks Beating The S&P 500

How To Invest In The Stock Market: Start With A Simple Routine




Source: https://www.investors.com/market-trend/stock-market-today/dow-jones-futures-tesla-stock-microsoft-visa-amd-earnings/

Brexit “Singapore on the Thames” Fantasies

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Yves here. The UK’s post-Brexit “Singapore on the Thames” pretenses should be laughed out of the room. Anyoe who has been paying attention knows that the UK and its Crown Dependencies are already a monster tax haven; pray what more is there to be gained with Brexit? And as this talk points out, there is much to be lost. The EU will be able to crack down on UK financial institutions when the UK is outside the EU that it can’t, or can’t very well, right now.

On top of that, Singapore has a population of 5.6 million versus the UK’s 66 million. So even if “Singapore” made some sort of sense, it can’t be scaled up enough to serve as a national strategy.

Originally published at the Tax Justice Network

This week the Tax Justice Network’s John Christensen spoke at this event at the European Parliament organised by the European Free Alliance of the Greens on Brexit and the future of tax havens. Here’s more information on the event and you can watch the whole thing here. John spoke on the impact of Brexit on tax evasion and money laundering, offering up some important recommendations on how the EU should move forward in its treatment of the UK, its satellite havens and the City of London. Here are the notes he spoke from, and the accompanying slides.

BREXIT AND THE FUTURE OF TAX HAVENS

The Impact of Brexit on Tax Evasion and Money Laundering

22nd January 2019

It will come as no surprise that at the time of the 2016 referendum the UK government did not have a clear vision of the type of relationship for trade in financial services they would be seeking with the EU27 once Brexit is finalised.

The initial assumption seems to have been that passporting rights could be retained for the UK-based financial services sector and extended to satellites in the crown dependencies and overseas territories.  This was the message I heard in the summer of 2016 both in London and the Channel Islands.

However, once it had become clear by end-2016 that passporting would not be a viable option, the focus shifted to gaining acceptance of mutual recognition of regulatory standards on the basis of equivalence.

Judging from discussions I’ve had this month in London, this expectation of recognition of equivalence of standards remains the goal for post-Brexit relations.

I am going to suggest that granting of equivalence should be contingent on the UK and its dependencies committing to and implementing minimum standards on transparency and regulatory compliance, and these commitments are subject to regular – annual – review of their spillover impacts on EU and other third-party states in order to block the UK from engaging in tax wars and regulatory competition.

Before discussing this further, I want to raise my concerns about the UK government’s proposals for a Singapore-on-Thames.

Senior government ministers have been signalling the Singapore-on-Thames development strategy since January 2017, when Prime Minister May and her Chancellor Philip Hammond both flagged it up as a potential route.  Since then other senior ministers, including Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt and Home Secretary Sajid Javid, have signalled that this is the model they would pursue post-Brexit.

Just to put this in context, Singapore has rapidly expanded its role as an offshore financial centre in the past decade, currently ranks number five on the Financial Secrecy Index, and has a secrecy score of 67.  That secrecy score reflects general weaknesses in Singapore’s corporate transparency regime and low level of commitment to tackling corporate tax dodging.

So this raises questions about what senior politicians in London mean when they talk about Singapore-on-the-Thames.  Mr Javid – a serious contender to replace Theresa May as leader of the Conservative Party, who has worked as a banker in Singapore – has spoken about using tax cuts and deregulation as part of a “shock and awe strategy” to transform the post-Brexit UK economy.

What the Singapore-on-the-Thames visionaries appear to have in mind can be summed up as:

  • A commitment to sweeping tax cuts for corporations and mobile rich people – tax wars as a fiscal weapon;
  • Tax measures such as accelerated capital allowances to attract mobile investments to UK;
  • Comprehensive de-regulation, removal of social and environmental protections;
  • Weak or non-existent compliance with international anti-money laundering measures;
  • Retaining golden visa arrangements to provide residence rights of wealthy non-British citizens, increasing exposure to oligarchs and corrupt illicit financial flows.

Of course, none of this is new.  The UK set out down the route of becoming a major tax haven economy in the 1950s, and has pursued this development strategy under governments of all complexions.

The scale of the risks that tax haven Britain already imposes on other countries is revealed by a recent spillover analysis conducted by a research team comprising Professor Andrew Baker (SPERI) and Professor Richard Murphy (City University). These risks include:

  1. The use of “competitive” cutting of the corporate income tax rate to the lowest among G20 countries, accompanied by favouring of territorial taxation which encourages profits shifting to tax havens, patent box arrangements, relaxed controlled foreign company rules, special facilities to encourage location of company treasury operations in tax havens:
  2. The UK’s (non) domicile rule which undermines the CIT and PIT tax bases of other countries by making Britain an attractive haven for high and ultra high net worth individuals;
  3. Notwithstanding the commitment to making company ownership information available on public registry, the Companies House registry is under-resourced and the available information is frequently inaccurate, out of date, and incomplete. This presents a major barrier to investigation.
  4. Company and trust administration practices in the UK and its tax haven dependencies threaten the integrity of third party country tax regimes because they (a) fail to accurately identify the beneficial owners of companies, (b) don’t comply with or enforce delivery of accounting data, and (c) don’t require adequate disclosure of company trading data;
  5. In practice British arrangements undermine the tax regimes of other countries by not requiring companies that are incorporated in Britain, but which claim to trade in third party countries and not in the UK, to submit annual tax returns. This creates a blind spot in international information exchange processes which deprive revenue authorities of other countries of vital information;
  6. Crucially, Britain continues to sustain a spider’s web of satellite tax havens and secrecy jurisdictions which act in a vertically integrated way to block information exchange processes and undermine international cooperation on tackling money laundering.

Looked at in isolation, the UK appears to be relatively transparent and fit for cooperation in anti-money laundering and anti-tax evasion programmes.  But this is something of a Potemkin village: yes, the UK has committed to an open public registry of beneficial ownership of companies, but in practice the information available from Companies House is frequently out of date, inaccurate and consequently useless.  Compliance across the entire financial services sector is weak, reflecting an under-resourced and fragmented regulatory service.

Among the many things revealed by the Panama and Paradise Papers leaks, it should be clear to everyone that British territories like the British Virgin Islands, Cayman, and the Channel Islands are intimately linked to the UK through commercial, legal and political ties.  They even boast about these ties in their promotional literature.  Collectively the provide a complex and evolving ecosystem of laws, regulations and (non)compliance, which undermines transparency and regulation across the world.

At the Tax Justice Network we consider the UK and its dependencies as a single entity, with London sitting as the voracious spider at the centre of a secrecy web which spans the globe.  Our financial secrecy index reveals that this web is not uniform in its provision of secrecy to non-resident clients.  While the UK appears relatively transparent in terms of laws and regulations, the majority of its satellites have secrecy scores which fall into the red zone, making them highly vulnerable to abuse by tax evaders and money-launderers.

This range of scores does not happen by accident.  London likes to do its dirty business elsewhere, providing plausible deniability for its bankers, officials and politicians.

Despite all the promises to be transparent and cooperative, Britain’s offshore secrecy jurisdictions have resolutely refused to make their company registries open to public scrutiny, and some have even threatened to secede if this is forced upon them.

Shamefully, these threats of secession have a historical echo; during the period of huge public campaigning to end Britain’s slave economy in the early C19th, some of the same Caribbean territories currently resisting anti-money laundering measures also threatened to secede in order to protect the interests of their slave plantation owning elites.

This month the UK Government has delayed plans to implement a parliamentary decision to require these British territories to make ownership publicly available.

This is why we argue that Britain’s tax haven empire should be treated as a single entity and judged on the score of its lowest common denominator, currently the Turks & Caicos Islands with a secrecy score of 77 out of 100.

This approach provides a realistic assessment of Britain’s progress towards tackling tax cheating and money-laundering.

On this basis Britain and all of its secrecy jurisdiction territories should be included on the European Union’s blacklist and on every other tax haven blacklist.

So what is to be done in the context of Britain’s imminent withdrawal from the European Union?

The implication of the Prime Minister’s threat of a Singapore-on-the-Thames strategy is that London will continue with its weak anti money-laundering regime and its support for offshore secrecy in order to attract dirty money from all corners of the world.

Its satellite secrecy jurisdictions will continue to resist measures to strengthen international cooperation and make offshore companies and trusts more transparent.  And the UK government will be complicit with this refusal to cooperate.

In such circumstances, it seems foolhardy for the European Union to grant financial service providers in London equivalent treatment to providers who operate within the Single Market and are regulated under the common rulebook.  Put simply, this gives the fox full access to the hen house.

Therefore the first of my two principal recommendations is that the European Union should commission a comprehensive spillover analysis of the external risks posed by the British tax haven empire taken as a single entity.

This spillover analysis should be conducted by experts independent of any political influence, and its remit should be to provide an assessment of potential threats to the integrity of EU member states on the basis of the weakest points across the entire British spider’s web.  In other words, look behind the greenwash of domestic laws in the UK itself and make an assessment on the basis of what international law firms, banks and accounting practices can do in territories like Bermuda, Cayman and the Turks & Caicos.

This spillover analysis should inform any decision by the EU regarding the recognition of equivalence of regulation.  Until such time as the UK government requires all of its dependencies to fully adopt transparency standards (e.g. public registries of beneficial ownership), recognition of equivalence should be withheld and London-based banks and law firms should be required to operate within the Single Market on the basis of having commercial establishment subject to regulatory oversight by an EU Member State (in compliance with WTO rules on services falling under the mode 3 arrangements).

My second recommendation relates to the taxing of multinational companies.  The threat of a post-Brexit UK government accelerating the race-to-the-bottom on tax rates and special treatments is clear and imminent.  This can only worsen the rise of inequality and the undermining of the capacity of democratic states to protect their citizens.

The EU must therefore proceed with its Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base project and move towards an apportionment-based approach for allocating profits to the countries where they are genuinely.

But establishing a common standard for the tax base will not protect individual member states from the predatory actions of a potential spoiler state committed to a Singapore-on-the-Thames strategy.  The common tax base will need to be underpinned by an agreed minimum rate, say 25 percent, to block the race-to-the-bottom tactics adopted by tax havens.

The threat of a post-Brexit Singapore-on-the-Thames places Europe at a point in its political evolution at  which it must choose between committing to deeper cooperation, for example on setting a common corporate tax base underpinned by a minimum tax rate, or whether to follow through on the current race-to-the-bottom trajectory, which will inevitably further erode national tax bases and regulatory, leading to slower growth, increased financial market volatility, deeper inequality and social division.

Thanks for your attention.

This entry was posted in Banana republic, Banking industry, Brexit, Economic fundamentals, Free markets and their discontents, Guest Post, Politics, Regulations and regulators, Ridiculously obvious scams, Taxes on January 26, 2019 by .

Post navigation




Source: https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2019/01/brexit-singapore-thames-fantasies.html

EXO Turn Into Bikers in 'Tempo' Teaser Video Ahead of New Album's Release

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Popular K-pop boy band EXO is almost back, and they’re revving excitement up with their latest teaser video ahead of their upcoming album.

Earlier on Sunday (Oct. 21), the nine-member group shared their Tempo Concept short film, revealing a hint of what's to come from their upcoming Don't Mess Up My Tempo album and the upcoming single “Tempo.”

The brief, 30-second clip revealed the group as a charismatic biker gang, driving along a nighttime road and posing amid dusty dunes with motorcycles. Though there aren’t any group shots of EXO unmasked, each of the nine men -- Sehun, D.O., Kai, Chanyeol, Xiumin, Lay, Chen, Suho and Baekhyun -- are featured in their own leather and jean-clad looks.

The video gave a brief hint of the sound of "Tempo" starting off with a dramatic synth melody, pulsating beat and the phrase "I can't believe."

A promotional poster shared on the group's official website hints at the plot of the upcoming music video for “Tempo,” showing eight of the members sans Lay, who will be featured on an EXO album for the first time since 2016's For Life. The image includes a caption that reads: “Speed loving bikers enter the fragment of frozen time as they log into the red cube. Solving the given puzzle is the only route for all to escape. However, the bikers are unable to resist the temptation and reenter the cube.”

All of EXO’s social media accounts have been updated with icons of red cubes.

Don’t Mess Up My Tempo will be EXO's fifth LP, and is set to be released on Nov. 2. It will feature 11 songs, including two variants of “Tempo,” one in Korean and one in Chinese.  

Following the Tempo film's release, the album's name trended worldwide for several hours on Twitter.




Source: https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/k-town/8480933/exo-tempo-teaser-video-new-album

Fed doesn't have to worry about high inflation, and that's a problem

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Barney Frank wearing a suit and tie: Jerome Powell, chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, speaks during a news conference following a Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2019.© Provided by CNBC LLC Jerome Powell, chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, speaks during a news conference following a Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2019. There was a time not so long ago that defeating inflation would have been considered a huge victory for the Federal Reserve. No more: The lack of price and wage pressures in the economy these days is perhaps the central bank's biggest failing.

For those around in the 1970s and early '80s, runaway inflation was the single biggest threat to American prosperity. It was so bad that then-Fed Chairman Paul Volcker deliberately pulled the country into recession in order to defeat runaway prices.

Nowadays, the exact opposite is true. While Americans will still complain about the prices they pay at the grocery store and gas pump, real inflation as economists define it hasn't been around for pretty much all of the 21st century.

In fact, Fed officials are concerned enough about the lack of inflation that they will be examining it closely this year as part of a broader look at how they execute policy and convey their actions to the public.

Related video: There is simply no inflation in the system

Click to expand
UP NEXT

UP NEXT

"It's an acute failure on the Fed's part," said Danielle DiMartino Boothe, a former top aide to ex-Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher and author of "Fed Up: An Insider's Take on Why the Federal Reserve is Bad for America." "They have generated inflation, just not where it's needed."

Where policymakers would like to see inflation is in areas like wages so workers can improve their standard of living, and even some discretionary consumer goods so companies can have pricing power. While paychecks have been growing more strongly of late , and there is some evidence of price pressures, the Fed's preferred inflation gauge has remained stubbornly below the central bank's 2 percent goal for the most of the economic recovery that began in mid-2009.

There's been some inflation

There has been, however, inflationary pressure elsewhere, particularly in prices of risky assets like stocks and corporate bonds.

Indeed, a New York Fed gauge that includes prices, real activity and financial asset values — the Underlying Inflation Gauge — sees inflation running right around 3 percent. The stock market, of course, has soared since the depths of the crisis, thanks in large part to the Fed's moves to boost risk-taking.

But that's not the measure the broader Fed follows, and it remains a struggle to break out of the inflation abyss.

"Had the Fed been using a 2 percent target based on the UIG, [former chairs] Janet Yellen and Ben Bernanke would have been compelled to raise interest rates much earlier than they did," said Booth, who also is CEO of Quill Intelligence. "We would not have entered this era of utter complacency where economies are less and less responsive to quantitative easing."

QE, as it is called, was a bond-buying program exercised in three rounds that was aimed at lowering long-term interest rates and jacking up asset prices, which would be used as a "wealth effect" transmission mechanism to boost the economy. Along with all that was supposed to come inflation that critics of QE thought eventually would run out of control and force the Fed into a Volcker-like pattern of monetary policy tightening.

The ultimate effects of the program, though, have been long debated, with St. Louis Fed economist Stephen D. Williamson issuing two papers suggesting that QE had limited or no benefits.

Current Fed Chairman Jerome Powell also has questioned QE's effectiveness in the past , and told Washington lawmakers last week that he wants the Fed to get better at the inflation issue.

Specifically, Powell said in response to a question from Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., that he wants to "make that 2 percent inflation target credible, so that inflation kind of averages around 2 percent, rather than only averaging 2 percent in good times and then averaging way less than that in bad times, which would drag expectations down."

"No decisions have been made," the chair added. "There are plenty of questions and concerns to be addressed. But there's also a problem that I think we owe it to the public to try to think our way through the best possible way to address that problem, so that we can carry out our mandate."

Falling short of expectations

Powell subscribes to a popular mindset among central bankers that inflation is most influenced by expectations — in essence, that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy if business leaders, investors and the public think inflation will be high.

One possible solution, then, would be for the Fed to say it wants a higher inflation level. That, however, was dimissed by Powell during the hearing.

Another way would be for the Fed to target a price level rather than a percent target, as it does now.

Finally, it could simply let the economy run hotter than normal, thus driving up inflation and perhaps achieving its goal that way.

"A reasonably good model of inflation expectations is adaptive expectations: the public usually expects the inflation that has recently prevailed to prevail in the future. To generate higher inflation expectations, the Fed then should focus on generating higher realized inflation," J.P. Morgan Chase economist Michael Feroli said in a recent note.

"To do this it simply lets the economy run hot by keeping rates lower than it otherwise would. Over time this should stimulate aggregate demand, eventually pushing up wage and price inflation," he added. "Higher inflation leads eventually to higher inflation expectations [and] higher nominal interest rates."

That has proven to be true, but there's one key ingredient for it to happen: credibility. In other words, there has to be belief that the Fed can deliver on the inflation it promises.

"The Fed could come out tomorrow and say, 'We're going to target 4 percent inflation.' Great — You can't even get 2," said Joe LaVorgna, chief economist for the Americas at Natixis. "It's a weird situation where some people might say they've got too much credibility [in keeping inflation low]. Others might say they have no credibility because they can't get the inflation they want."

Moreover, LaVorgna thinks the Fed gets too much credit — or blame, as it were — for low inflation.

Other factors, particularly inherently disinflationary technological advancements, and the continuing trend toward globalization, have conspired to keep inflation low, he said.

The policy ramifications

On a policy level, this creates several issues for the Fed.

For one thing, it's making it harder for Powell and his fellow central bankers to justify further interest rate hikes, especially with U.S. and global GDP easing back from a strong 2018. Where Fed officials said in their latest forecast that they anticipate two quarter-point hikes this year, the market is pricing in almost no chance of even one move this year.

In turn, that gives the Fed less wiggle room in the case of another economic slowdown or crisis and increases the chance that the benchmark funds rate once again will head toward zero — or even to negative numbers, as one recent paper suggested.

Booth, the former Dallas Fed official, said the central bank is in a quandary of its own making, caused by easy policy that generated huge amounts of debt and overcapacity, where the economy created more than it could consume.

"You have to take that overcapacity out of the system. If you have zombie companies walking around, if you have a bunch of dead weight in the economy, you're never going to be able to grow," she said. "Piling more debt onto that funeral pyre isn't going to do that. It's just going to make a bigger fire."




Source: http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/the-fed-doesnt-have-to-worry-about-high-inflation-anymore-and-thats-a-problem/ar-BBUuM5W?srcref=rss

Podcast #317 – Patricia Morrill, “The Perils of Uncoordinated Care”

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)
Podcast #317 - Patricia Morrill, "The Perils of Uncoordinated Care" – Lean Blog
Ten 5-star reviews on Amazon --> Measures of Success: React Less, Lead Better, Improve MoreOrder
+



Source: https://www.leanblog.org/2018/09/podcast-317-patricia-morrill-the-perils-of-uncoordinated-care/

Links 3/21/19

Posted by [email protected] on Comments comments (0)

Quantum Machine Appears to Defy Universe’s Push for Disorder Quanta (David L)

The world’s happiest countries REVEALED: Finland comes top while South Sudan is the bleakest Daily Mail

Study shows IPCC is underselling climate change PhyOrg (David L)

New Climate Change Visualization Presents Two Stark Choices For Our Future Earther (David L)

Britain Will Have Water Shortages In 25 Years Thanks to Climate Change, Environment Chief Says Motherboard (resilc)

Four Wikipedias To ‘Black Out’ Over EU Copyright Directive WikiMedia Foundation

Kentucky governor says he exposed his children to chickenpox NBC (Kevin W)

Satellites just photographed California’s dazzling ‘super bloom’ of spring flowers from outer space Business Insider (David L)

San Francisco Moves To Ban E-Cigarettes Until Health Effects Known BBC

Sex, Empathy, Jealousy: How Emotions And Behavior Of Other Primates Mirror Our Own NPR (David L)

China?

Trump Says Tariffs Will Stay Until China Complies With Deal Bloomberg

Brexit

Revoke Article 50 and remain in the EU. Petitions, UK Government and Parliament. Includes a map.

The UK will have very little control over trade tariffs in the event of a no-deal Brexit Independent

Syraqistan

WaPo Gives Campaign Space To Main Sponsor Of ISIS Who Also Jails More Journalists Than Anyone Else Moon of Alabama (Kevin W)

Exclusive: How Iran fuel oil exports beat U.S. sanctions in tanker odyssey to Asia Reuter. Resilc:

Rules for USA USA to learn:

1. You can never beat guys in sandals with AK 47s
2. Iranians have been traders in hostile territory for a couple of thousand years

US exit from Afghanistan could spark wider conflict Asia Times

Big Brother is Watching You Watch

Volvo To Add In-Car Sensors To Prevent Drunk Driving Reuters

Porn and the state: when size really does matter 1828 (guurst)

Inside the Video Surveillance Program IBM Built for Philippine Strongman Rodrigo Duterte Intercept

The Marines Are Test-Flying Their Plywood Drone Popular Mechanics (resilc)

Imperial Collapse Watch

16 years ago today Axios (resilc)

Why America Needs a Stronger Defense Industry New York Times (resilc)

Trump Transition

Donald Trump is using Stalinist tactics to discredit climate science Guardian (Tom H)

US judge halts hundreds of drilling projects in groundbreaking climate change ruling Guardian (J-LS)

Oil and gas leasing rejected in Wyoming because, well, climate change Grist

2020

In early campaigning, 2020 Democrats try out tactics for taking on Trump Reuters (resilc). How about, as Lambert might say, starting out by not sucking???

Joe Biden Faces the Unthinkable: Can He Not Keep Up with Bernie? Vanity Fair (resilc)

Bernie Hires Former Hillary Staffer As Research Chief New York Magazine (resilc)

Is Betomania Real or Phony? New York Times

Elizabeth Warren town hall: how the US could end the Electoral College Vox

‘We shouldn’t be inviting bullies to our neighbourhood’: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defends her criticism of Amazon HQ2 in surprise Queens appearance Business Insider (Kevin W). Not wild about the framing. I should have written about this, but IMHO the issue was affordable housing in Queens. I would have had way less trouble with this deal if it had been in Hudson Yards. In Silicon Valley, cities are having trouble staffing schools and hospitals due to housing costs. Second issue is that it’s normal in NYC development deals for the locals to squawk and the developer to have to give sweeteners. But Amazon just picked up and left.

Minn. lawmakers aim to reduce salt runoff from sidewalks Minneapolis Star-Tribune (Chuck L)

AT&T CEO interrupted by a robocall during a live interview The Verge (resilc)

State AGs put tech giants on notice: ‘Something must be done with these companies … they have become too big’ Business Insider (David L)

MMT

Is MMT “America First” Economics? Institute for New Economic Thinking. Depressing. One word response: “Japan”.

Wolfers Blames MMT for Orthodox Economists’ Ignorance of MMT Bill Black, New Economic Perspectives

Powell Signals Prolonged Fed Pause as Inflation Lags, Risks Loom Bloomberg

Monsanto risk takes root with Bayer investors Financial Times (J-LS)

No More Fed Rate Hikes in 2019… Econospeak. Click through to see the chart.

What FedEx Just Said About Europe and China Wolf Richter

Class Warfare

In 24 States, 50% or More of Babies Born on Medicaid; New Mexico Leads Nation With 72% CSNNews (resilc)

It just became easier for employers to dump retirees’ pensions CNN (Paul R)

Uber drivers demand their data Economist (David L). This could be fun. Users could demand data too….

New Futurist Fear: “Economic Singularity” Could Kill Jobs Forever Futurism (David L)

Meritocracy doesn’t exist, and believing it does is bad for you Slate

Antidote du jour (Kimberly R):

And a bonus (Richard Smith):

See yesterdays Links and Antidote du Jour here.

This entry was posted in Links on March 21, 2019 by .

Post navigation



Source: https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2019/03/links-3-21-19.html


Rss_feed